C09994383 / invoice 10000

Species:CANINE
Breed:Miniature Dachshund - Smooth Haired
Age (years):5
Diagnosis or signs:skin
Consult notes

Animal clinical history (3 most recent)

2026-03-03T00:00:00Z 4:39 PM
Appointment Notes: VETSTORIA:  0431110827 Frankie (Dog) - Standard Consult [Veterinarian : Dr Nick Glen(No Preference)] - He healed up perfectly from his previous allergy but he must've walked through something yesterday because he's frantically scratching again.:Web BookingClient name: Lauren QuinnContact number: 0431110827Email address: lauren.quinn.m@gmail.comPatient name: FrankieHISTORY: Seen 2 weeks ago for skin allergy after being in Centennial ParkResponded well to Pred.Went back to Centennial Park yesterday, chewing paws as soon as he got home.Doing well on Fluoxetine, only 2 weeks into trialEXAMINATION: Ventrum: quite dry but no papules like last time.Mild pododermatitisDIAGNOSIS: Underlying allergy- contact vs atopyTREATMENT:  Happy to repeat Pred 5mg PO BID for 2 days, then SID for 2 daysPLAN: Will avoid Centennial Park for now, if skin still relapses recommend CytopointStill try to go to Centennial Park in winter- if skin still affected then we know it is a contact allergy. If not affected more likely seasonal    Vital Signs    Weight: 8.3;       

Previous claim history (7)

DateClaim #Diagnosis
2026-02-18C09926165PRURITUS - PRESENTING COMPLAINT
2026-02-18C09926165BEHAVIOUR DISORDER
2026-01-08C09726416SNEEZING - PRESENTING COMPLAINT
2025-12-18C09650316SNEEZING - PRESENTING COMPLAINT
2025-12-18C09650316BEHAVIOUR DISORDER
2025-12-18C09677369SNEEZING - PRESENTING COMPLAINT
2025-12-18C09677369BEHAVIOUR DISORDER

Line items(lines with upstream diagnosis are skipped by the model)

LinetstarcAmountDateUpstream diagnosis
10000tstarc_consultation-revisit60.002026-03-03
20000tstarc_corticosteroids32.002026-03-03

UPM+

  • DG02109PRURITUS - PRESENTING COMPLAINTDSTP_clinical_signs_-_pruritus

Variant (sleepy_king)

PRURITUS - PRESENTING COMPLAINT
DSTP_clinical_signs_-_pruritus
Conf: 0.500
Threshold: 0.63
Above:
Correct?