C09983927 / invoice 10000

Species:CANINE
Breed:Spoodle Cross
Age (years):6
Diagnosis or signs:hind limb lameness
Consult notes
REASON: RIGHT pelvic limb lamenessREFERRING VETERINARIAN: William @ Greencross MidlandHISTORY: Owner reports no current skipping observed. He is otherwise bright and active, though generally less active than when younger. No other significant health concerns. History of dental disease requiring multiple extractions. Previous episode of gastrointestinal upset (diarrhoea and inappetence) suspected to be associated with meloxicam following a dental procedure; has previously tolerated meloxicam at time of neutering.Gait: No skipping currently observed by owner.Medications: Previous meloxicam (possible adverse reaction on one occasion).Imaging: noneClinical Pathology: noneOther dog Oakley previously underwent bilateral surgery for medial patellar luxation and has recovered well, with improved weight bearing and increased activity. EXAMINATION:Gait: No lamneness observed during consultation.LEFT Thoracic Limb: NSFRIGHT Thoracic Limb: NSFLEFT Pelvic Limb: Mild reduction in muscle mass compared with RIGHT pelvic limb. Grade 2 MPL with free luxation and reduction. RIGHT Pelvic Limb: unable to luxate patellaASSESSMENT: Low-grade LEFT medial patellar luxation PLAN: Schedule LEFT medial patellar luxation surgical correction. Pre-operative radiographs to be performed on the day of surgery for planning purposes; CT not considered necessary. Surgery booked for 31 March with 08:30 admission. CLIENT COMMUNICATION: Discussed findings of low-grade luxation and recommendation for surgical correction given persistent instability. Explained that procedure is expected to be similar to previous surgery (Oakley) and that major tibial/femoral corrective osteotomy is unlikely based on examination. CT imaging discussed but not recommended due to low-grade nature and straight limb conformation; radiographs on the day of surgery considered sufficient. Discussed previous suspected adverse reaction to meloxicam; plan to avoid meloxicam and consider alternative NSAID. Admission time and booking confirmed. Owners invited to raise any further questions prior to surgery.

Animal clinical history (3 most recent)

2026-03-03T00:00:00Z 9:30?am
REASON: RIGHT pelvic limb lamenessREFERRING VETERINARIAN: William @ Greencross MidlandHISTORY: Owner reports no current skipping observed. He is otherwise bright and active, though generally less active than when younger. No other significant health concerns. History of dental disease requiring multiple extractions. Previous episode of gastrointestinal upset (diarrhoea and inappetence) suspected to be associated with meloxicam following a dental procedure; has previously tolerated meloxicam at time of neutering.Gait: No skipping currently observed by owner.Medications: Previous meloxicam (possible adverse reaction on one occasion).Imaging: noneClinical Pathology: noneOther dog Oakley previously underwent bilateral surgery for medial patellar luxation and has recovered well, with improved weight bearing and increased activity. EXAMINATION:Gait: No lamneness observed during consultation.LEFT Thoracic Limb: NSFRIGHT Thoracic Limb: NSFLEFT Pelvic Limb: Mild reduction in muscle mass compared with RIGHT pelvic limb. Grade 2 MPL with free luxation and reduction. RIGHT Pelvic Limb: unable to luxate patellaASSESSMENT: Low-grade LEFT medial patellar luxation PLAN: Schedule LEFT medial patellar luxation surgical correction. Pre-operative radiographs to be performed on the day of surgery for planning purposes; CT not considered necessary. Surgery booked for 31 March with 08:30 admission. CLIENT COMMUNICATION: Discussed findings of low-grade luxation and recommendation for surgical correction given persistent instability. Explained that procedure is expected to be similar to previous surgery (Oakley) and that major tibial/femoral corrective osteotomy is unlikely based on examination. CT imaging discussed but not recommended due to low-grade nature and straight limb conformation; radiographs on the day of surgery considered sufficient. Discussed previous suspected adverse reaction to meloxicam; plan to avoid meloxicam and consider alternative NSAID. Admission time and booking confirmed. Owners invited to raise any further questions prior to surgery.    Vital Signs    

Previous claim history (7)

DateClaim #Diagnosis
2024-01-05C6743676PAIN - MUSCULOSKELETAL - PRESENTING COMPLAINT
2023-12-14C6640890ANAL SAC DISORDER
2023-10-31C6477621ANAL SAC DISORDER
2023-07-12C6090887DENTAL ILLNESS TREATMENT
2023-06-07C5972198ANAL SAC IMPACTION
2022-02-08C4477218ANAL SAC IMPACTION
2021-02-25C3553482DESEXING

Line items(lines with upstream diagnosis are skipped by the model)

LinetstarcAmountDateUpstream diagnosis
10000tstarc_consultation-specialist250.002026-03-03

UPM+

  • DG01268PATELLA LUXATIONDSTP_patella_luxation

Variant (sleepy_king)

PATELLA LUXATION
DSTP_patella_luxation
Conf: 0.920
Threshold: 0.72
Above:
Correct?